7-day free trial Book a demo
Barbados Bar Association Conference: Evidence in Criminal Matters

Barbados Bar Association Conference: Evidence in Criminal Matters

Posted by matt-terrell | 04 May 2018

Evidence in Criminal Matters: Reliability of uncorroborated Oral Confessions

Are the current standards for admissibility of uncorroborated oral confessions sufficient?

Should less weight be placed on such evidence?

These questions, among many others, will be discussed at this year’s Barbados Bar Association Conference on May 18-20, 2018.

As Attorney-at-Law Kristin C. Turton in his interview with us notes, there are a number of investigations in which the main, or sometimes the only, evidence is that of an oral confession. This oral confession is gained by police without any independent third party or attorney present. Sometimes, the confession though recorded in the Police notebook is not ‘initialled or otherwise independently acknowledged’ by the suspect, thus resulting in evidential questions as the case proceeds.

The discussion at the conference will surround the recent decision of the Caribbean Court of Justice in the case of Edwards & Haynes v. The Queen [2015] CCJ 17, in which the highest regional court ‘answered this question in the context of two men who were convicted of murder primarily on the basis of unacknowledged or uncorroborated oral confessions.’

Why this topic?

As Kristin C. Turton observes, with increased levels of crime regionally, ‘there is always a temptation to lower the standard of the evidence which is acceptable so that more convictions can be secured. This topic is important because it allows for an evaluation of our evidentiary standards in the context of one commonly used form of evidence which can be subject to that type of temptation.’

Barbados Bar Association Conference

The conference is to provide an opportunity for jurists to discuss the evidential standards which may be more appropriate. According to Kristin C. Turton, attorneys can ‘determine whether we agree that this type of evidence is not reliable and, if so, reaffirm that the standard of evidence ought not to be lowered to the point where individuals are punished (particularly with a term of imprisonment) on the basis of that type of evidence.’

For more information on the Barbados Bar Association and their conference, visit their website.

You can also contact admin@barbadosbarassociation.com for more information.

Related Blogs

Posted by david-hand | 25th September 2018
On September 6th, the teams from the Legal Design Sprint returned to London to present their ideas to a panel of judges. With an impressive range of creative solutions offered...
Posted by david-hand | 24th September 2018
On July 26th, Justis co-hosted a Student Legal Design Sprint with Emily Allbon of The City Law School, University of London, where a group of highly engaged students began to apply Legal Design to...
Posted by matt-terrell | 7th August 2018
Two key elements of the recent Legal Design Sprint were the five real-world problem areas, and how the students applied legal design thinking to conceptualise new solutions to these problems, and...